WELL until they do, i believe it will bear repeating, sdk sdk sdk sdk
sdk.... it only makes sense, they have opened up an app store.


On 15 April 2013 12:12, Stefan Kubicek <[email protected]> wrote:

> I hope so too. The "new features" vs SDK anhancement debate has been
> rolling here and on the beta testers
> forum for so long and persistently now that I'm sure Chris and colleagues
> have heard us. It's up to them now...
>
>
>
>  Hey maybe 2015 they will liberate the sdk in softimage :)
>>
>>
>> On 15 April 2013 10:37, Stefan Kubicek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  I think thats pretty common when you look at older software. In the
>>> beginning it's all about new features and making use of new paradigms a
>>> software offers. As it matures and collects features,
>>> people become aware and weary of the small annoying things that might
>>> have
>>> been plaguing them for years,
>>> hence they are more thankful having one or two thorns removed from their
>>> bread and butter tools rather than the next big Crowd Simulation toolset
>>> only a handful of people will never need. It's mostly been UI (Qt,
>>> viewport) and now modeling tools for Maya too for the last couple of
>>> versions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  na the dx 11 is cool but its seems to becoming standardised, max was
>>> over
>>>
>>>> due for some UI enhancements, view port switching was painful before, i
>>>> remember that, but I was speaking more specifically about the larger
>>>> features. which is ironic when you think about it, the little tweaks and
>>>> fixes are more interesting then the key features discussed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 13 April 2013 20:12, Gustavo Eggert Boehs <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  3ds max users I know were vey excited with this release. Specially
>>>>
>>>>> regarding small annoying things, with viewport performance
>>>>> enhancemants/dx11 in a close seccond.
>>>>>
>>>>> A direct quote:
>>>>> "Man now I can maximize my viewport only hovering the mouse. No need to
>>>>> make it active!"
>>>>>
>>>>> This wowed me a lot as an SI user ;-)
>>>>> Em 13/04/2013 13:57, "Sebastien Sterling" <
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>> escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>> is it me, or did all the max features look ..Mickey Mouse ? they didn't
>>>>>
>>>>>  look like very useful or serious additions
>>>>>> , with the exception of the little search box thing, which in fairness
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> a blessing for max (modifier list anyone ?), but nothing outside of
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> seemed to give max an edge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13 April 2013 00:34, Bradley Gabe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   No problem. As we all know, emails can be easily misunderstood.
>>>>>>> =)****
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  What exactly did you mean by that comment, Ed?  :-Z
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------****-------------
>>>                Stefan Kubicek
>>> ------------------------------****-------------
>>>
>>>            keyvis digital imagery
>>>           Alfred Feierfeilstraße 3
>>>        A-2380 Perchtoldsdorf bei Wien
>>>          Phone:    +43/699/12614231
>>>       www.keyvis.at  [email protected]
>>> --  This email and its attachments are   --
>>> --confidential and for the recipient only--
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> ------------------------------**-------------
>                Stefan Kubicek
> ------------------------------**-------------
>            keyvis digital imagery
>           Alfred Feierfeilstraße 3
>        A-2380 Perchtoldsdorf bei Wien
>          Phone:    +43/699/12614231
>       www.keyvis.at  [email protected]
> --  This email and its attachments are   --
> --confidential and for the recipient only--
>
>

Reply via email to