Interesting. The fact they include a kinematics node as part of the Model 
structure would suggest to most folks that it's ok to use it the way I've been 
using it. Most of what I do though lacks a need for simulation or mixer 
requirements, so I've not had chance to experience some of these issues. It 
does answer some nagging questions I've had over the years, though.

Guess it's time to return to "old school" and embrace transform groups again :)


--
Joey Ponthieux
LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES)
Mymic Technical Services
NASA Langley Research Center
__________________________________________________
Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not
represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raffaele Fragapane
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 3:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Models and ICE

Consider a model as anything other than a name space and a top level host for 
mixers and deltas and you are half way down the road to madness and picking up 
speed.
Models are made to be created when you need a definite name space, or isolate a 
mixer/delta, and be hidden and left alone ever after.

That's the beginning and the end of it and has always been that way in the 
small secret club of people trying to stay sane :p
Have a consistently named "input" item for each model/namespace/component to 
host graphs that are supposed to hop around different items (assuming you don't 
mind, or simply can't avoid efficiently, the performance hit of a graph with 
multiple outputs and corresponding excessively frequent pulls).

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES] 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Eric,

Thanks. I guess now I am confused. I always interpreted Model as a toplevel 
parent. If I understand this right the practice is to have a transform group 
underneath the Model and the rest of the hierarchy underneath the transform 
group? All animation is then performed at the transform group and below while 
the model is nothing more than a "mini scene" container and kinematics at model 
level are ignored. Is that a correct assumption?

--
Joey Ponthieux
LaRC Information Technology Enhanced Services (LITES)
Mymic Technical Services
NASA Langley Research Center
__________________________________________________
Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and do not
represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.

Reply via email to