Strange.
What you need to do is :

1 - Create Sphere
2 - set Sphere or UV projection.
3 - in the same ppg EDIT the Uv Projection and choose "Implicit"
4 - Render. It should work.


2013/7/28 Nancy Jacobs <[email protected]>

> Luca, I didn't freeze the object, but the image texture doesn't render
> either. I'm using 2014 also.
>
> On Jul 27, 2013, at 11:06 PM, "Luca!!!!" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Uh... interesting bug, I've just discovered. I remembered freezing an
> implicit object was losing the Implicit property. But it seems is not like
> that anymore.
> To prevent this problem Softimage simply doesn't let you freeze the object.
> The bug is (if it is a bug as I think it is) after trying to freeze the
> sphere in Implicit mode and getting the sphere back to explicit it removes
> the property, but it's impossibile to freeze the object in anyway, and
> removing the projection it removes the object, too.
> Softimage still thinks the object is in Implicit mode, without showing the
> implicit UV. Isn't it weird?
> SI 2014.
>
>
> 2013/7/28 Luca!!!! <[email protected]>
>
>> If you set "implicit projection", it will be visible only in render.
>>
>> Anyway you can't freeze it or it will lose the implicit property.
>>
>>
>> 2013/7/28 Nancy Jacobs <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I thought I'd solved my problem with images distorting in spherical
>>> mapping, by...what? Reading the manual. But, no....
>>>
>>> Apparently, creating a 'purely implicit' texture projection is supposed
>>> to solve this issue of image distortion at the poles. They even have
>>> pictures proving it. However, I can't get any image to map to a sphere
>>> using this texture projection method. I also found, in the manual, that one
>>> is supposed to use an 'image implicit' node to map the image (they don't
>>> tell you that initially, you have to accidentally find it...). However,
>>> that doesn't work either. All I get is the dreaded generic color one gets
>>> when ones texture projection is not in the same universe, if you know what
>>> I mean.
>>>
>>> Having followed the manual's instructions, what am I missing here?
>>>
>>> Thanks for any,
>>> Nancy
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ...superpositiviii...qualunque cosa accada!...
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ...superpositiviii...qualunque cosa accada!...
>
>


-- 
...superpositiviii...qualunque cosa accada!...

Reply via email to