+1 Paul. i think a great yet tiered example of this is the LEGO movie, you can tell its not the most ambitious or expensive project, and yet it was so cleverly made. SI really shines as a complete and elegant solution.,incidentally if you look at the latest stuff yet to come out, it looks like the big studios are trailering back the quality a notch, Mr Peebody, the good dinosaur. these do not seem to be as extravagant as Brave, or Tangled.
On 18 March 2014 15:58, <[email protected]> wrote: > "Last year was a watershed one for the industry for many different reasons > resulting in many significant changes to our strategy" > > Yes, the industry is changing. Budgets are getting smaller and work needs > to be done faster. > > So surely, the wise thing to do would be to invest in the tool with the > fastest workflow. I have spent the last 3 years demonstrating to my studio > why Softimage needs to be what we are using to make our projects feasible, > and despite the fact, I'm the only Softimage person there. I have managed > to persuade them through demonstration and now we are setting up production > with it. > By making tools that perform complex tasks quickly ( Softimage and ICE > combo ), There is a huge market to be explored doing movie quality work on > television that would have been unfeasible a few years ago. > > How do you think it feels after all that effort, RIGHT before the project > is about to start, to hear this news? Its utterly short sighted and I > imagine it will be rather embarrassing when we reveal how we managed to > pull this off , as its going to be a testament to the clear advantage given > by Softimage over any other solution and I will take every opportunity I > can to say that. > > There is no way I'm going to change tracks back to a tool I had to spend > all that time proving Softimage was far superior to. > > > > > -----Original Message----- From: Maurice Patel > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:21 PM > > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Autodesk webinar > > Hi Perry, > At that time, although Softimage was not an area we were planning on > investing more in, there was no plan to discontinue it. That decision was > only made at the end of last year. Last year was a watershed one for the > industry for many different reasons resulting in many significant changes > to our strategy. At the time this statement was made we did not even have > any plans for MayaLT. Unfortunately things can change very fast. > maurice > > Maurice Patel > Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134 > > From: [email protected] [mailto:softimage-bounces@ > listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Perry Harovas > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 11:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Autodesk webinar > > Maurice, I know things change, but this statement from Marc was only a > year and a half ago: > > "Autodesk plans to continue to develop all of products mentioned [in this > story]. These are all solutions that serve many different customer needs > across multiple industries and in many different types of workflows. > We are not discontinuing development on any of the products you mentioned > but we will increase focus in specific areas where individual products are > strong." > > > >
