Imho, Apple was Steve Job only. Now it has no vision, it has a wallet
though...
(And I'm not fan of Steve Job)
Le 18/03/2014 17:46, Angus Davidson a écrit :
Unfortunately people seldom learn from history. The parallels are
uncanny. 5 or so updates later FCP X is a decent system compared to
launch. The problem is most people have moved on. They didnt listen
to what their users needed and they delayed their new gen Mac pro to
long. Budgets have to be spent and most of them were on non apple
machines and Avid and Adobe software. As some folks know I am a big
Apple fan but that left me shaking my head and wondering what the hell
they were smoking.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Jordi Bares [[email protected]]
*Sent:* 18 March 2014 06:36 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: Autodesk webinar
Exactly what Apple did with Final Cut Pro, and guess what happened?
the whole industry moved to Avid and Adobe Premiere.
Jordi Bares
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
On 18 Mar 2014, at 16:33, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes, absolutely!!
Its one thing deciding to shut down Softimage – however stupid that
decision is,
but to not allow purchases of new seats, except for existing
customers. That’s just mean minded and bullying. Its like they are
trying their hardest to make enemies.
*From:* olivier jeannel <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 18, 2014 4:29 PM
*To:* [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: Autodesk webinar
I think the opposite.
AD should make it available to buy seats.
Why AD is refusing ? they will earn money for nothing. That I don't
understand.
Le 18/03/2014 17:21, Mirko Jankovic a écrit :
People... do you REALLY think that there is anything at all left to
be said?
I saw screw AD, screw PR and all marketing from each nd every copany.
Only thing important is use tool that works for you.
Right now if it is Softimage, keep using it as long as it serves you
and gets food on your table.
In the next couple years if there is something better go for it if
not.. keep using SI fro another 10 years if needed.
In any case it doesn't make any sense at all to go through PR
firewall of AD.
It was clear from day one back in 2008 that AD will kill Softimage,
and every single year after that was step in that direction.
It is pure business war that AD won offer SI and SI is casualty...
nothing we can do there nor they will ever change their mind.
Use what works for you and stop waisting time on this PR crap..
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Morten Bartholdy
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes please share Paul.
Morten
Den 18. marts 2014 kl. 17:09 skrev Marc-Andre Carbonneau
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> Hi Paul,
>
> If your company allows it, could you share the
document/presentation you wrote highlighting your comparisons
and choices to convince them?
> Very appreciated,
> MAC
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: 18 mars 2014 11:59
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Autodesk webinar
>
> "Last year was a watershed one for the industry for many
different reasons resulting in many significant changes to our
strategy"
>
> Yes, the industry is changing. Budgets are getting smaller and
work needs to be done faster.
>
> So surely, the wise thing to do would be to invest in the tool
with the fastest workflow. I have spent the last 3 years
demonstrating to my studio why Softimage needs to be what we are
using to make our projects feasible, and despite the fact, I'm
the only Softimage person there. I have managed to persuade them
through demonstration and now we are setting up production with it.
> By making tools that perform complex tasks quickly ( Softimage
and ICE combo ), There is a huge market to be explored doing
movie quality work on television that would have been unfeasible
a few years ago.
>
> How do you think it feels after all that effort, RIGHT before
the project is about to start, to hear this news? Its utterly
short sighted and I imagine it will be rather embarrassing when
we reveal how we managed to pull this off , as its going to be a
testament to the clear advantage given by Softimage over any
other solution and I will take every opportunity I can to say that.
>
> There is no way I'm going to change tracks back to a tool I
had to spend all that time proving Softimage was far superior to.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maurice Patel
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Autodesk webinar
>
> Hi Perry,
> At that time, although Softimage was not an area we were
planning on
> investing more in, there was no plan to discontinue it. That
decision was
> only made at the end of last year. Last year was a watershed
one for the
> industry for many different reasons resulting in many
significant changes to
> our strategy. At the time this statement was made we did not
even have any
> plans for MayaLT. Unfortunately things can change very fast.
> maurice
>
> Maurice Patel
> Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134 <tel:514%20954-7134>
>
> From: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of
Perry Harovas
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 11:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Autodesk webinar
>
> Maurice, I know things change, but this statement from Marc
was only a year
> and a half ago:
>
> "Autodesk plans to continue to develop all of products
mentioned [in this
> story]. These are all solutions that serve many different
customer needs
> across multiple industries and in many different types of
workflows.
> We are not discontinuing development on any of the products
you mentioned
> but we will increase focus in specific areas where individual
products are
> strong."
>
>
>
>
This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is
confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not
copy or disseminate this communication without the permission of the
University. Only authorised signatories are competent to enter into
agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised
that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the
University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the
author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between
the University and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless
the University agrees in writing to the contrary.
