I keep asking myself if anyone at Autodesk even considers the possibility that they might have made a big mistake?
Anyway, here’s some ICE stuff: https://vimeo.com/68035569 — Neural network creation https://vimeo.com/64077456 — ICE used to control the boat movement on the water, as well as for all the boat rigging and sails simulation https://vimeo.com/60450003 — Used to create and then explode the ice… https://vimeo.com/43619675 — ICE used for the grass, but also for a cobbled-stone-road-designer compound https://vimeo.com/30435359 — Used for the crosshatching as well as some other inking https://vimeo.com/14934033 — ICE strands https://vimeo.com/89426397 — Post-its generated and controlled in ICE (you’ll likely have seen it in another thread) Obviously ICE is also used in “invisible” ways in many other jobs, making things work behind the scenes. Jean-Louis On 21 Mar 2014, at 21:34, Tim Crowson <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I the only one who finds it bizarre that we should illustrate to AD why > ICE is cool? Shouldn't the applications of its product be well-known to them, > considering the decision to kill it? I'm not saying this to be > facetious...but shouldn't they, as the entity that develops and maintains it, > be aware of how it has been used, and aware of the capabilities of their own > software? > > Alastair, was the question posed because the person you spoke with was > genuinely unaware of what their product (ICE) does? Say it ain't so. "We > bought this and developed it, but we don't really know what it is..." > > -Tim > Jean-Louis Billard Digital Golem BE: +32 (0) 484 263 563 UK: +44 (0) 7973 660 119 [email protected] http://www.digitalgolem.com/ 53 Rue Gustave Huberti 1030 Brussels
