And while you are it, make it possible to parent this sets to assets or something. I can only imagine the total mess of having all the sets on the same level when importing references.
there is no harm in asking, right? Thanks, Cris On 19 November 2014 16:31, Eric Thivierge <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand for non-trivial relationships custom editors would be useful. > Set driven keys is a perfect example. We're not really talking about that > though. We're talking about membership of a container where its a one to > one relationship. 1 set to 1 object. Its either a member or not. I > equivocate it to a parent-child relationship. Which you can do in the > Outliner. Hope this can be considered for workflow enhancements in the > future. > > Best, > Eric T. > > > On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 11:23:34 AM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote: > >> Coming from softimage, you expect to do everything in the >> Outliner/Explorer, but in Maya the Outliner displays the DAG (i.e. the >> scene hierarchy), and then there is the Relationship Editor for >> connections, sets, driven keys, everything that's relationships. >> It's unified and consistent in that way. >> >> it's possible that in the future Maya's Outliner will be more like >> XSI's explorer but that doesn't help you right now so I don't preface >> my posts with theoretical blah blah blahs. >> >> We started to introduce something like relationship editors later in >> Softimage's life with the XSI Explorer, set driven key, keyable >> parameter editor, etc. Rejean was a big fan of having views with two >> Explorers side-by-side like Maya's relationship editors. >> > >
