Totally agree with Emilio Hernandez & Tenshi S. AD knew since the very beggining that SI was built with years ahead of concepts and worflows. And every release was a pain to them that the least commercialized/advertised software was the one that got the jobs out the door quicker and paid. Not so much with the "other AD 3d package brothers" do they do it now, taking advantage of SI technology? well.. 2018 will tell..
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Tenshi S. <[email protected]> wrote: > I saw this a few days ago, and i was wondering why i still don't > understand EOL. > To hell with "A". > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Sebastien Sterling < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> they used 2013 for this, and according to the guy this stuff could have >> been implemented years ago. do people still use lightwave as an alternative >> for this kind of shading ? >> >> On 29 May 2015 at 15:56, Nicolas Esposito <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> o_o >>> >>> Thats pretty impressive! >>> >>> 2015-05-29 16:54 GMT+02:00 Emilio Hernández <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Beside the amazing job, presentation and tech data. I would like to >>>> see the faces of the attendants showing all of this in an EOL software… >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for sharing and again amazing job! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Long live Softimage. >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Portfolio 2013 <http://be.net/3dcinetv> Cinema & TV production Video Reel <https://vimeo.com/3dcinetv/reel2012>
