I thought they mentioned having rendermaps in soft actually working
partially, they were just looking for a method on how to implement it
across the board.
I could be completely wrong though. Either way i would like  the volumes
more :), sorry baking guys.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Matt Morris <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'd say the timescale for rendermapping/baking will be months rather than
> weeks - seems like complex volume rendering will come before baking.
>
> On 8 January 2016 at 09:28, Ognjen Vukovic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It wasn't supported up till now, I think they will be introducing it in
>> the coming weeks.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:18 AM, James De Colling <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> sorry for the potentially silly question, but how is redshift with
>>> Rendermap? we use it extensively with MR, and would need redshift to have
>>> the same capability
>>>
>>> James,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Morten Bartholdy <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wow, it is quite impressive what an impact Redshift has made already.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have done a fair amount of testing with Redshift too and find on
>>>> average scenes to be 5-10 times faster than Arnold with comparable quality,
>>>> plus a number of things are simpler to set up the way you want it, in part
>>>> because of the rapid feedback in the renderregion. I have yet to test it on
>>>> really complex scenes, so that will be the next thing to check. I agree on
>>>> a lack of shader support in certain parts, especially compared to
>>>> Arnold/Sitoa, so it is reassuring that Burtnyk and Co are so responsive :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We will likely also incorporate it to some extent when it supports vdb
>>>> and volumetric rendering and see where it takes us.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Morten
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Den 5. januar 2016 kl. 19:50 skrev "Emilio Hernández" <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Softimage and Redshift.    Best marriage ever!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have 4 licenses.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> www.matinai.com
>

Reply via email to