On Oct 12, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote: > I appreciate the feedback on DHCPv6 design style to not use two entities to > represent the same primitive but if DHCPv6 is such a stick in the mud, we > could go with some other control mechanism. After all several protocols use > FQDN and IP address interchangeably and the deployments are working fine.
You've hit the nail on the head, Hemant. Custom protocols have no trouble with this. It's because DHCP is a general-purpose protocol that this becomes a problem. If you want a custom protocol, you should define a custom protocol. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
