Yong, Rajiv, Le 19 août 2011 à 14:16, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) a écrit :
> Yong, > > Why is dIVI not included In the discussion ? In my understanding, differences between dIVI and the proposal of draft-murakami-softwire-4v6-translation-00 are minimal. They both use a double-translation tunneling method, with a stateless address mapping between A+P and IPv6. It seems therefore that either double-translation tunneling is out of scope, or dIVI is also in scope. Did I miss something? Regards, RD _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
