Le 2012-02-08 à 12:04, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit : > Hi Remi, > > 4rd would be quite applicable for some UEs, e.g. mobile routers which > are in charge of a 3G/4G uplink and manage several devices connected > to them such as in vehicles.
Yes, I think so. It remains to: - finalize 4rd - find mobile operators that understand the potential - find mobile-OS vendors that support it Not necessarily a long path IMHO (but not necessarily a fitness trail either). Regards RD > > Regards, > > Behcet > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Rémi Després <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Behcet, >> >> Le 2012-02-08 à 09:46, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit : >> >>> Hi Cameron, >>> 4rd solution IMHO is more suitable for a fixed network. CPE in 4rd is >>> not appropriate to be hosted in a UE. >>> >>> I think your solution 464XLAT's mobile part is way better for your >>> purposes. There you can put all your IPv4 resources on the PLAT box so >>> that CLAT box is kept simpler. >>> >>> In 4rd, CPEs have A+P and BR is kept "stateless" these are not so >>> useful for your purposes, I think. >> >> Note however that: >> - 464XLAT doesn't support shared IPv4 addresses (while 4rd does) >> - 4rd over 6rd can work, and therefore offer both IPv6 and shared-address >> IPv4 on an RFC1918 network, e.g. on a 3GPP IPv4 PDP (while 464XLAT cannot >> AFAIK). >> >> Regards, >> RD >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Behcet >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Cameron Byrne <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Are the map and 4rd solutions deployable for existing networks that do not >>>> have reserves of ipv4 ? My assumption is that these solutions target >>>> existing networks that have meaningful growth and they need a v6 solution. >>>> >>>> If yes, how? Any pointers within the reams of drafts I should look for? >>>> >>>> In my brief and simple skimming, it appears to me that setting up one of >>>> these solutions would require me to collapse my existing network to harvest >>>> back the addresses so that they may be redeployed in map. >>>> >>>> What would the deployment process be for an address exhausted network of 10 >>>> million subs with 10% annual growth be? >>>> >>>> Cb >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Softwires mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Softwires mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
