Hi Remi, I know this is possible to do, in theory. However my question is more toward manageability of the network. IMHO, layering one tunnel (or translation) protocol on another tunnel protocol is asking for trouble.
Cheers, /Yiu On 2/8/12 2:13 AM, "Rémi Després" <[email protected]> wrote: >6rd can be deployed over Net-10 networks (RFC1918) to deployIPv6. >Shared public IPv4 addresses can then be offered to customers via this >IPv6. >Such a use case, based on the header-mappiong variant of 4rd-U rather >than on a double MAP encapsulation, is described in >tools.ietf.org/html/draft-despres-softwire-4rd-u-03#section-5.4. > >RD > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
