> -----Message d'origine----- > De : softwires-boun...@ietf.org > [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Alain Durand > Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2012 07:24 > À : Peng Wu > Cc : Softwires WG; draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite; > draft-penno-softwire-sd...@tools.ietf.org > Objet : Re: [Softwires] draft-penno-softwire-sdnat vs. > draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite > > > > In my understanding, now the principle of the mechanism is > similar to > > the lightweight 4over6 draft, but I may miss something here. > > The general idea is the same, however loghtweight 4over6 does > not specify how to achieve it, it leaves the technique > to assign address and port open. stateless DS-lite (aka > sdnat-02) does specify exactly how you achieve this. >
Med: I'm sorry to say this is not true. Please read: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite-05#section-5. Four provisioning alternatives are listed there. If the WG want to make a decision on the ** mandatory ** one, this will be reflected in future version of the document. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
