Thank you. I believe the answer to my question is 'no'. Still, it is good to see that you are planning to deploy MAP-T. It is certainly an important data point.
Do you plan to substitute dIVI and dIVI-PD by MAP-T or run them in parallel? From: Congxiao Bao <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:04:47 +0800 To: Cisco Employee <[email protected]> Cc: Zhang Huanjie <[email protected]>, Softwires WG <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rd Hi Penno, MAP-T was derived from dIVI and dIVI-PD, which has been running at CERNET2 for two years and have been tested at China Telcom both in Beijing and Hunan last year. In addition, the dIVI-PD was demonstrated successfully in Softwire Interim Meeting in Beijing last September. BTW, the MAP-T code will be available soon. Congxiao 2012/3/23 Reinaldo Penno <[email protected]> > Is there experimental data for MAP running on production networks? > Certainly that is an important point to consider. > > On 3/22/12 11:06 PM, "Zhang Huanjie" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> >4rd-U is in the very early design stage, there is no running code. In >> >addition, it tries to modify the IPv6 address architecture. We need to >> >see the experimental data before making any decision. >> > >> >-- >> >Zhang Huanjie >> >E-mail/msn: [email protected] >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Softwires mailing list >> >[email protected] >> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
