On 23 March 2012 13:40, Reinaldo Penno <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Wojciech Dec <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:26:48 +0100 > To: Cisco Employee <[email protected]> > Cc: Congxiao Bao <[email protected]>, Softwires WG <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rd > > Hi, > > On 23 March 2012 13:10, Reinaldo Penno <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thank you. I believe the answer to my question is 'no'. >> > > divi and divi-pd and MAP-T are essentially the same, algorithmically, ie > with the MAP algorithm and certain paramaters set (eg M=1) they are the > same. The difference of "on-the-wire" encoding would not appear to have any > tangible effect on experimental data collected for divi. > > [RP] Interesting, thanks for the clarification. Can dIVI and MAP-T > hosts/CPEs interoperate given they are essentially the same? >
Well, MAP-T and divi-pd in non-address-sharing mode (ie 1:1) should be totally compatible. However, given that the "on-the-wire" encoding of the PSID is different in the address sharing mode, interoperability in that mode won't be there. Cheers, Woj. > > > Eg http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sunq-v6ops-ivi-sp-02 > > > [RP] I will read it and provide feedback. Thanks for the pointer. > > > -Woj. > >> >> Still, it is good to see that you are planning to deploy MAP-T. It is >> certainly an important data point. >> >> Do you plan to substitute dIVI and dIVI-PD by MAP-T or run them in >> parallel? >> >> From: Congxiao Bao <[email protected]> >> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:04:47 +0800 >> To: Cisco Employee <[email protected]> >> Cc: Zhang Huanjie <[email protected]>, Softwires WG <[email protected]> >> >> Subject: Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rd >> >> Hi Penno, >> >> MAP-T was derived from dIVI and dIVI-PD, which has been running at >> CERNET2 for two years and have been tested at China Telcom both in Beijing >> and Hunan last year. In addition, the dIVI-PD was demonstrated successfully >> in Softwire Interim Meeting in Beijing last September. BTW, the MAP-T code >> will be available soon. >> >> Congxiao >> >> >> 2012/3/23 Reinaldo Penno <[email protected]> >> >>> Is there experimental data for MAP running on production networks? >>> Certainly that is an important point to consider. >>> >>> On 3/22/12 11:06 PM, "Zhang Huanjie" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > >>> >4rd-U is in the very early design stage, there is no running code. In >>> >addition, it tries to modify the IPv6 address architecture. We need to >>> >see the experimental data before making any decision. >>> > >>> >-- >>> >Zhang Huanjie >>> >E-mail/msn: [email protected] >>> > >>> >_______________________________________________ >>> >Softwires mailing list >>> >[email protected] >>> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Softwires mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
