From: Wojciech Dec <wdec.i...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:26:48 +0100 To: Cisco Employee <repe...@cisco.com> Cc: Congxiao Bao <cx.cer...@gmail.com>, Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rd
Hi, On 23 March 2012 13:10, Reinaldo Penno <repe...@cisco.com> wrote: > Thank you. I believe the answer to my question is 'no'. divi and divi-pd and MAP-T are essentially the same, algorithmically, ie with the MAP algorithm and certain paramaters set (eg M=1) they are the same. The difference of "on-the-wire" encoding would not appear to have any tangible effect on experimental data collected for divi. [RP] Interesting, thanks for the clarification. Can dIVI and MAP-T hosts/CPEs interoperate given they are essentially the same? Eg http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sunq-v6ops-ivi-sp-02 [RP] I will read it and provide feedback. Thanks for the pointer. -Woj. > > Still, it is good to see that you are planning to deploy MAP-T. It is > certainly an important data point. > > Do you plan to substitute dIVI and dIVI-PD by MAP-T or run them in parallel? > > From: Congxiao Bao <cx.cer...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:04:47 +0800 > To: Cisco Employee <repe...@cisco.com> > Cc: Zhang Huanjie <ja...@ustc.edu.cn>, Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org> > > Subject: Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rd > > Hi Penno, > > MAP-T was derived from dIVI and dIVI-PD, which has been running at CERNET2 for > two years and have been tested at China Telcom both in Beijing and Hunan last > year. In addition, the dIVI-PD was demonstrated successfully in Softwire > Interim Meeting in Beijing last September. BTW, the MAP-T code will be > available soon. > > Congxiao > > > 2012/3/23 Reinaldo Penno <repe...@cisco.com> >> Is there experimental data for MAP running on production networks? >> Certainly that is an important point to consider. >> >> On 3/22/12 11:06 PM, "Zhang Huanjie" <ja...@ustc.edu.cn> wrote: >> >>> > >>> > >>> >4rd-U is in the very early design stage, there is no running code. In >>> >addition, it tries to modify the IPv6 address architecture. We need to >>> >see the experimental data before making any decision. >>> > >>> >-- >>> >Zhang Huanjie >>> >E-mail/msn: ja...@ustc.edu.cn >>> > >>> >_______________________________________________ >>> >Softwires mailing list >>> >Softwires@ietf.org >>> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> Softwires@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
