Hi Wjociech, So the only different between MAP-T and dIVI-PD is the new PSID calculation in MAP. Otherwise, they are identical.
Thanks, Yiu From: Wojciech Dec <wdec.i...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:01:59 +0100 To: Reinaldo Penno <repe...@cisco.com> Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rd Well, MAP-T and divi-pd in non-address-sharing mode (ie 1:1) should be totally compatible. However, given that the "on-the-wire" encoding of the PSID is different in the address sharing mode, interoperability in that mode won't be there. Cheers, Woj.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
