Le 2012-08-08 à 16:13, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) a écrit : > +1 > > I also support MAP-E and MAP-T, as Maglione pointed out. We need to be > respectful of the design team that produced MAP based on consideration and > requirements.
> Not to forget that MAP-T (unlike others) has already been deployed. Without ignoring that, - the clear order of preference for a single standard solution has been in Vancouver first MAP-E, then 4rd, then MAP-T well behind, - the design team of 4rd also deserves respect, - a number of issues have yet to be closed regarding what is exactly MAP-T, could you communicate, for the sake of information, the DMR, and the BMRs/FMRs if any, of the deployment(s) you are referring to? Thanks, RD > > Cheers, > Rajiv > > Sent from my Phone > > On Aug 8, 2012, at 5:35 AM, "Maglione Roberta" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> in my opinion the design team did a great job in creating the MAP draft as >> a common baseline specification for MAP-T and MAP-E flavors and the >> presentations we saw in Vancouver last week shown that implementations for >> both MAP-T and MAP-E already exist and they just differs for few lines of >> code. >> >> As this working group already discussed in the past, there are use cases >> that can be simply covered by MAP-T flavor of the MAP solution, for example >> being able to apply ACL's and policies tied to customer's profile stored in >> Radius server at the BNG level without requiring additional work and >> correlations on the BR. >> Speaking as a Service Provider I do care about these use cases, thus I would >> encourage the working group to adopt the current MAP draft as is (including >> MAP-T and MAP-E) as the basis for the proposed standard stateless solution >> and keep working on common MAP solution. >> >> Thanks >> Best regards, >> Roberta >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan >> Sent: mercoledì 8 agosto 2012 0.02 >> To: Softwires WG >> Subject: [Softwires] Call for confirming the selection of MAP-E as the basis >> for the proposed standard stateless solution >> >> Hi all, >> During the softwire WG meeting at IETF84 a series of questions* to >> determine the preferred solution in the meeting room indicated that the >> sense of the room was in favor of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed >> standard stateless solution. >> >> This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is WG consensus >> towards the selection of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed standard >> stateless solution. Please state whether or not you're in favor of this >> selection by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please >> also (re)state your objections in your response. The call will complete >> at midnight EDT on 2012-08-21. >> >> Regards >> Suresh & Yong >> >> * Questions are available at >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-softwire-15.pdf >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle >> persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante >> dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora >> abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di >> darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua >> distruzione, Grazie. >> >> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged >> information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, >> printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended >> recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the >> sender by return e-mail, Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
