I support to standardize MAP-E as the stateless solution. Let's move
forward. Thanks for both chairs and Ralph to shepherd the discussion.

On 8/7/12 6:02 PM, "Suresh Krishnan" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi all,
>  During the softwire WG meeting at IETF84 a series of questions* to
>determine the preferred solution in the meeting room indicated that the
>sense of the room was in favor of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed
>standard stateless solution.
>
>This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is WG consensus
>towards the selection of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed standard
>stateless solution. Please state whether or not you're in favor of this
>selection by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please
>also (re)state your objections in your response. The call will complete
>at midnight EDT on 2012-08-21.
>
>Regards
>Suresh & Yong
>
>* Questions are available at
>
>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-softwire-15.pdf
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Softwires mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to