Chairs, I support the decision we've reached in Vancouver. Thank you for wonderful chairing so that we can finally move forward.
2012/8/8 Rémi Després <[email protected]>: > Hi, Suresh, > > > 2012-08-08 00:02, Suresh Krishnan : > >> Hi all, >> During the softwire WG meeting at IETF84 a series of questions* to >> determine the preferred solution in the meeting room indicated that the >> sense of the room was in favor of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed >> standard stateless solution. >> >> This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is WG consensus >> towards the selection of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed standard >> stateless solution. Please state whether or not you're in favor of this >> selection by replying to this email. > > Although I personally voted for 4rd, I acknowledge how important it is to > make a choice, and that the WG expressed a clear preference for > Encapsulation. > Since some the identified limitations of MAP-E can easily eliminated in a new > draft, as noted in particular by Mark and myself, I support Encapsulation as > the WG choice for standard track. > > Regards, > RD > > >> If you are not in favor, please >> also (re)state your objections in your response. The call will complete >> at midnight EDT on 2012-08-21. >> >> Regards >> Suresh & Yong >> >> * Questions are available at >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-softwire-15.pdf >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
