On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Lee, Yiu <[email protected]> wrote: > I support to standardize MAP-E as the stateless solution. Let's move > forward. Thanks for both chairs and Ralph to shepherd the discussion. >
+1 Encapsulation is the way to go. Yuppi. Just like DS-Lite :-). Behcet > On 8/7/12 6:02 PM, "Suresh Krishnan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi all, >> During the softwire WG meeting at IETF84 a series of questions* to >>determine the preferred solution in the meeting room indicated that the >>sense of the room was in favor of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed >>standard stateless solution. >> >>This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is WG consensus >>towards the selection of MAP-E as the basis for the proposed standard >>stateless solution. Please state whether or not you're in favor of this >>selection by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please >>also (re)state your objections in your response. The call will complete >>at midnight EDT on 2012-08-21. >> >>Regards >>Suresh & Yong >> >>* Questions are available at >> >>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-softwire-15.pdf >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Softwires mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
