Hi Ole, It's another problem that confused me: do containers contain options or sub-options. In map-dhcp-05. Section 4 says they are suboptions, but section 10 requires DHCPv6 option codes.
Best Regards, Cong 2013/11/15 Ole Troan <[email protected]> > Cong, > > > DHCPv4/PCP enable options will be outside containers, because containers > contains sub-options. > > I don't think that will work. > DHCPv6 server sends two containers MAP_E and LW46. > the client must be able to associate the "enable options" to one of them. > I see Simon is suggesting that we don't need those options anyway, > something I concur with. > > cheers, > Ole > > > > > > Cong > > > > 2013/11/15 Ole Troan <[email protected]> > > Qi, > > > > >> if optional, we have to think through the corner cases: > > >> - how does a CPE know when to initiate DHCPv4 (or PCP)? > > > > > > [Qi] An enable option (DHCPv6 option) would indicate the CPE to use > DHCPv4 (or PCP), like the DHCPv4oDHCPv6 Enable Option in DHCPv4oDHCPv6. > > > > let me see if I understand your proposal. > > provision the softwire with the LW46 container option. > > > > the container options then contains one of: > > - the IPv4 address option > > - enable DHCPv4 option > > - or enable PCP option > > > > ? > > > > cheers, > > Ole > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
