On Nov 15, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Simon Perreault <[email protected]> wrote: > Good question, but it needs to be scoped to "PCP requests for IPv4 external > ports". PCP requests for IPv6 external ports still make sense in an IPv6-only > world.
Yes, I think the PCP option actually needs to be a softwires-specific option, and its semantics need to be carefully thought out. > You're right, it seems to me that we have the same problem with PCP requests > for IPv4 external ports as we have with DHCPv4. *gasp* I will for sure be > thinking about this, and how it impacts sunset4. Yup. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
