On Nov 15, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote: > firstly it would still have to be inside the container. > secondly as Simon pointed out it isn't needed, as the absence of the IPv4 > address should suffice. > > thirdly we shouldn't be making broad solutions for IPv4. > is there any use case of this outside of softwires?
This discussion is not in scope for the softwires working group. If you want to have this discussion, please raise the issue on the dhcwg mailing list. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
