On Nov 15, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Simon Perreault <[email protected]> wrote: > Right. I think that the utility of enable options still needs to be > demonstrated.
Bear in mind that DHCPv4overDHCPv6 is intended to be a broad solution, not a softwires-only solution. So it makes some sense to have an enable option for it, which should be independent of the softwires DHCP options. As for PCP, how do you feel about DHCPv4 clients blabbing forever on IPv6-only links? Now, how about PCP clients on non-PCP links? No problem? Why is PCP different? _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
