>> Right. I think that the utility of enable options still needs to be >> demonstrated. > > Bear in mind that DHCPv4overDHCPv6 is intended to be a broad solution, not a > softwires-only solution. So it makes some sense to have an enable option > for it, which should be independent of the softwires DHCP options.
firstly it would still have to be inside the container. secondly as Simon pointed out it isn't needed, as the absence of the IPv4 address should suffice. thirdly we shouldn't be making broad solutions for IPv4. is there any use case of this outside of softwires? cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
