http://blog.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html shows how to keep updates in a separate core. Notice that it is an intermediate-level article for query syntax.
For persian text analysis, there is a pre-built analyser defiition in the techproducts example, start from that. It is in the schema.xml in server/solr/configsets/sample_techproducts_configs/conf and is one of the example configsets. Regards, Alex. ---- Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ On 1 September 2015 at 08:07, sara hajili <hajili.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > and another question is: > my docs are persian and i use text_fa for fieldType but i wanna to have a > persian textfield that handle search problem such as stemming. > word distance,synonyms etc > like english types. > as i said i handle "میخواهم " and "خواستن" and so on. > can you suggest me a fieldtype for handle this issues in persian field. > tnx > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:16 AM, sara hajili <hajili.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> i'm really confused:| >> i'm really anxious about cost of update like count. >> and as you said: >> <field name="like_count" type="int" indexed="true" stored="true" >> docValues="true"/> >> you indexed like_count field .and i think it cost alot to update and index >> again docs. >> because like count change more and more >> so isn't better to indede="false" that this field name??!! >> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> you don't need to use a dynamic field, just a normal field will work for >>> you. But, you *will* want to index it, and you may benefit from >>> docValues, so: >>> >>> <field name="like_count" type="int" indexed="true" stored="true" >>> docValues="true"/> >>> >>> Upayavira >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 10:59 AM, sara hajili wrote: >>> > my solr version is 5.2.1 >>> > i have a question. >>> > if i create 2 core .one for post and one for like . i must index like >>> > count? >>> > i mean in schema for like core i must write: >>> > <dynamicField name="like_count" type="int" indexed="false" >>> > stored="true"/> >>> > >>> > am i true? >>> > >>> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >>> > >>> > > So you want to be able to sort by the "number of likes" value for a >>> > > post? >>> > > >>> > > What version of Solr are you using? How many posts do you have? >>> > > >>> > > There's a neat feature in Solr 5.2.1 (I'm pretty sure it is there, not >>> > > 5.3) called score joins. Using that you can have two cores, one >>> > > containing your posts, and another containing your likes. >>> > > >>> > > You cannot *sort* on these values, but you can include your likes into >>> > > the score, which might even be better. >>> > > >>> > > If this sounds good, I can dig up some syntax for such a query. >>> > > >>> > > Upayavira >>> > > >>> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 10:36 AM, sara hajili wrote: >>> > > > hi. >>> > > > at first i.m sorry for my bad english! >>> > > > i have a social app.i want to use solr for searching in this app. >>> > > > i have many document (in my case people text that posted on my >>> social >>> > > > app). >>> > > > and i indexed this. >>> > > > but i'm have 1 issue and it is : >>> > > > >>> > > > i have very doc(post) and they have a property "like" is it good >>> > > > approach >>> > > > to index like count (people can like eachother post in my social >>> app)? >>> > > > likecount change more and more in one day.(so as i know it must be >>> set >>> > > > dynamic field) >>> > > > and if i indexed it ,i think it costs alot , to update and index >>> > > > likecount >>> > > > more and more even i use bach update. >>> > > > so is it approach to didn't index one field in solr but i could >>> sort my >>> > > > search result according to that unindexed field? >>> > > > >>> > > > tnx >>> > > >>> >> >>
