i used pre-built persian analyzer but it isn't enough for me. this work just for search exacly indexed work! like search 'go' and search result is 'go' as i said in english we have stemming,synonym,etc filters that help us to have flexible search. and i want some filter for persian. that pre-built text_fa doesn't satisfied me.have you better perisan filter than that?or a soulotion to have this filter in persian? tnx.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://blog.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html > shows how to keep updates in a separate core. Notice that it is an > intermediate-level article for query syntax. > > For persian text analysis, there is a pre-built analyser defiition in > the techproducts example, start from that. It is in the schema.xml in > server/solr/configsets/sample_techproducts_configs/conf and is one of > the example configsets. > > Regards, > Alex. > ---- > Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: > http://www.solr-start.com/ > > > On 1 September 2015 at 08:07, sara hajili <hajili.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > and another question is: > > my docs are persian and i use text_fa for fieldType but i wanna to have a > > persian textfield that handle search problem such as stemming. > > word distance,synonyms etc > > like english types. > > as i said i handle "میخواهم " and "خواستن" and so on. > > can you suggest me a fieldtype for handle this issues in persian field. > > tnx > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:16 AM, sara hajili <hajili.s...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> i'm really confused:| > >> i'm really anxious about cost of update like count. > >> and as you said: > >> <field name="like_count" type="int" indexed="true" stored="true" > >> docValues="true"/> > >> you indexed like_count field .and i think it cost alot to update and > index > >> again docs. > >> because like count change more and more > >> so isn't better to indede="false" that this field name??!! > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> > >>> you don't need to use a dynamic field, just a normal field will work > for > >>> you. But, you *will* want to index it, and you may benefit from > >>> docValues, so: > >>> > >>> <field name="like_count" type="int" indexed="true" stored="true" > >>> docValues="true"/> > >>> > >>> Upayavira > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 10:59 AM, sara hajili wrote: > >>> > my solr version is 5.2.1 > >>> > i have a question. > >>> > if i create 2 core .one for post and one for like . i must index like > >>> > count? > >>> > i mean in schema for like core i must write: > >>> > <dynamicField name="like_count" type="int" indexed="false" > >>> > stored="true"/> > >>> > > >>> > am i true? > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > So you want to be able to sort by the "number of likes" value for a > >>> > > post? > >>> > > > >>> > > What version of Solr are you using? How many posts do you have? > >>> > > > >>> > > There's a neat feature in Solr 5.2.1 (I'm pretty sure it is there, > not > >>> > > 5.3) called score joins. Using that you can have two cores, one > >>> > > containing your posts, and another containing your likes. > >>> > > > >>> > > You cannot *sort* on these values, but you can include your likes > into > >>> > > the score, which might even be better. > >>> > > > >>> > > If this sounds good, I can dig up some syntax for such a query. > >>> > > > >>> > > Upayavira > >>> > > > >>> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 10:36 AM, sara hajili wrote: > >>> > > > hi. > >>> > > > at first i.m sorry for my bad english! > >>> > > > i have a social app.i want to use solr for searching in this app. > >>> > > > i have many document (in my case people text that posted on my > >>> social > >>> > > > app). > >>> > > > and i indexed this. > >>> > > > but i'm have 1 issue and it is : > >>> > > > > >>> > > > i have very doc(post) and they have a property "like" is it good > >>> > > > approach > >>> > > > to index like count (people can like eachother post in my social > >>> app)? > >>> > > > likecount change more and more in one day.(so as i know it must > be > >>> set > >>> > > > dynamic field) > >>> > > > and if i indexed it ,i think it costs alot , to update and index > >>> > > > likecount > >>> > > > more and more even i use bach update. > >>> > > > so is it approach to didn't index one field in solr but i could > >>> sort my > >>> > > > search result according to that unindexed field? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > tnx > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >> >
