Oh, yeah. Thanks.
I guess there is a possible improvement, but it would take some work to
make sure the verbs haven't changed.
Or maybe precompute the inverse if g is name-free?
Henry
On 9/18/2016 11:41 AM, Roger Hui wrote:
If f=:g&.:h where h is a named verb, and subsequently you change h ...
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Nosing around in cu.c I find
static DF1(jtundco1){DECLFG; R df1( w,atop(inv(gs),ampco(fs,gs)));}
This is the routine that executes on the verb derived from u&.:v .
What I don't understand is why the calculation of the inverse and &: and @
are not performed before the derived verb is created. That result could be
stored in h, which would shorten this code to
static DF1(jtundco1){DECLFGH; R df1( w,hs);}
As it is, the inverse calculation etc are performed every time the verb is
executed on data.
Can anyone show cause why this calculation should not be performed during
the execution of &.: rather than in the derived verb?
Henry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
