The point to me is that if you execute f&.g 1000 times, you only need
the inverse of g once.
Henry
On 9/18/2016 1:09 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Mmm....
I think you need the inverse of h regardless of whether it contains any
names.
But I guess the point is that you do not need the inverse of h until after
g has completed. And organizationally speaking doing the check right at the
start (at or near the top level) makes sense.
...
That said, was baffled by steps 2 and 3 here, until I took a look at
jtundco1
Now, I think the example h=: f&.:g should be introduced, to match that
implementation.
Thanks,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
