How about? u&.:(v f.)
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oops. I meant h. > > g could matter, if it has a name, but it wouldn't participate in the > inverse. > > I am thinking: > > 1. try to get an inverse for h, returning failure if h contains a name > 2. see if g contains a name > 3. create the h field of the derived verb to contain either inv(gs) or > atop(inv(gs),ampco(fs,gs)) or 0 depending on how much was name-free > 4. modify jtundco1 etc accordingly > > Henry > > On 9/18/2016 12:29 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > >> Why would g matter, in this context? >> >> Thanks, >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
