How about?

  u&.:(v f.)

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oops.  I meant h.
>
> g could matter, if it has a name, but it wouldn't participate in the
> inverse.
>
> I am thinking:
>
> 1. try to get an inverse for h, returning failure if h contains a name
> 2. see if g contains a name
> 3. create the h field of the derived verb to contain either inv(gs) or
> atop(inv(gs),ampco(fs,gs)) or 0 depending on how much was name-free
> 4. modify jtundco1 etc accordingly
>
> Henry
>
> On 9/18/2016 12:29 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
>
>> Why would g matter, in this context?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to