Oops.  I meant h.

g could matter, if it has a name, but it wouldn't participate in the inverse.

I am thinking:

1. try to get an inverse for h, returning failure if h contains a name
2. see if g contains a name
3. create the h field of the derived verb to contain either inv(gs) or atop(inv(gs),ampco(fs,gs)) or 0 depending on how much was name-free
4. modify jtundco1 etc accordingly


On 9/18/2016 12:29 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Why would g matter, in this context?


For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to