You can do that if you like, but I am talking about having the code do that automatically if v contains no names.

Henry

On 9/18/2016 1:06 PM, Don Guinn wrote:
How about?

   u&.:(v f.)

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Oops.  I meant h.

g could matter, if it has a name, but it wouldn't participate in the
inverse.

I am thinking:

1. try to get an inverse for h, returning failure if h contains a name
2. see if g contains a name
3. create the h field of the derived verb to contain either inv(gs) or
atop(inv(gs),ampco(fs,gs)) or 0 depending on how much was name-free
4. modify jtundco1 etc accordingly

Henry

On 9/18/2016 12:29 PM, Raul Miller wrote:

Why would g matter, in this context?

Thanks,


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to