> Just to chime in with my preference, I think I'd prefer to have it > remain largely as we do today. > > - - Require manual package rebuilds. (assign people to keep a loose eye > on certain packages if there's a genuine problem with no re-builds > taking place) > > - - Keep the version going up for each internal rebuild. Yes we release > spacewalk-package-0.4.159 but I like that each new version > signifies a new tarball inside and we don't have to do any fancy > patching. Even if we decided on a way to bump versions during devel > cycle but then go to 0.4.0 at release would be nice. > > - - I'm not really keen on test-rpms appearing anywhere. I'd rather just > keep using these as a developer tool and anything appearing in repos be > versioned normally. > > Having the devel repo contain only packages that *somebody* decided to > manually tag seems good to me.
I concur with all of the above. jesus _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
