On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> That's what was planned. 2.6x are just bugfix releases, so if we's encounter 
> another *really* grave bug before we can release 2.70, we would have to do 
> another 2.63, but that's pretty unlikely.

I wouldn't say "pretty unlikely" there.  2.70 is likely to be several
months away (based on the current progress), and the bug fix releases
tend to be either for a single large bug, or several smaller bugs.

That said, we will hopefully have 2.62 be bug-free enough that we can
focus on 2.70 and get it out sooner rather than later.  We really need
to counter the bayes poison stuff, etc, which isn't going to happen with
a 2.6x release.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"It doesn't run on an open source platform, therefore it, by definition,
 does not matter."                               - James Lewis

Attachment: pgps6mL2B7UhS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to