On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:10:48PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:57:28AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: > > - then, periodically (every month or so?): > > - diff sf.net 2.6x against most recent "up to date with svn" tag > > - patch svn with that diff > > - update tag on current sf.net 2.6x > > I don't see the point in doing this. If we're going to keep SVN updated > from CVS, let's just use SVN and say "bon voyage" to CVS. I'd like to > get the ASF stuff heading in the right direction, get the repo moved over, > get 2.62 out RSN, and get 2.70 worked on. We have WAAAAAAY enough stuff > to work on for 2.70, or I'm actually thinking of calling it 3.0.0.
Now... is 2.62 GPL/PAL'd? or Apache? Sander, what are the restrictions on us releasing while in the incubator? (I don't know how far off 2.62 would be, but I'm just asking...) -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
