On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 05:57, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:10:48PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:57:28AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: > > > - then, periodically (every month or so?): > > > - diff sf.net 2.6x against most recent "up to date with svn" tag > > > - patch svn with that diff > > > - update tag on current sf.net 2.6x > > > > I don't see the point in doing this. If we're going to keep SVN updated > > from CVS, let's just use SVN and say "bon voyage" to CVS. I'd like to > > get the ASF stuff heading in the right direction, get the repo moved over, > > get 2.62 out RSN, and get 2.70 worked on. We have WAAAAAAY enough stuff > > to work on for 2.70, or I'm actually thinking of calling it 3.0.0. > > Now... is 2.62 GPL/PAL'd? or Apache? > > Sander, what are the restrictions on us releasing while in the > incubator? (I don't know how far off 2.62 would be, but I'm just > asking...)
Basically for ASF project releases you require a vote from the responsible PMC. In the case of SA that's the Incubator PMC (which will follow the judgement of the PPMC most of the time unless there are serious concerns). I'm assuming 2.62 is the last non-ASF release? And the 2.6x line ends there aswell? Sander
