On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:33:17PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > Hm. Can't we just develop in the 2.6x branch in SVN? That's what I meant > when I said "being picky" about that stuff: The non-CLA'd stuff is in the > Apache SVN anyway because we imported the whole history. So to me it > doesn't really make a difference where we work as long as we don't touch > the non-CLA'd stuff. The only difference it should make is that we can't > switch licenses yet and don't have the ASF "protection" for that code.
Yeah, that's what I've been saying. The repo was moved, we should just stick with SVN. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Euler's Identity ... the Sine/Cosine thing..." - Instructor Dean
pgpmUQBLWfGCB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
