At 16:46 -0800 3/15/02, ahimsa opined:
>someone (sorry, lost the attribution) suggested:
>>  Report spammers to their upstream providers.
>
>Is using SpamCop good enough?

SpamCop reports to the ISP that owns the IP address from which the 
mail originates (and/or to which the recipient is directed by an 
email address or website URL). It is actually quite good about 
figuring this out. In the case of the spammer equivalent of script 
kiddies -- who buy commercial spamware to distribute their spew but 
don't otherwise know what they're doing -- this is generally good 
enough. Recidivist criminal spammers, however, often get their IP 
addresses delegated to them. In that case, SpamCop ends up reporting 
the abuse to the spammer him/herself. I doubt this is particularly 
effective.

I do wish that SpamCop had the *option* of reporting abuse to one or 
more upstream providers. I suspect I know why they don't, though. 
Knowing when to do so can be tricky, and the larger backbone 
providers would soon get overwhelmed by (and probably blacklist) 
SpamCop reports that could and should be handled farther down the 
food chain.

>I also have another question. On many pieces of spam I notice that
>there is a string that looks like it may be an identifier of some
>kind.

Most spamware puts random letters at the end of the subject line to 
prevent people from creating simple filters to trash the spam.

In addition, a great deal of tracking goes on. Most mail clients, for 
example, will load the images in an HTML message only when it is 
actually viewed. The URLs pointing to the images can contain an 
encoded form of the recipient's email address, thereby alerting the 
spammer that s/he has an email address of someone who actually opens 
and looks at spam. For that reason, you should *always* set your 
email client to not display images in HTML email. If your client 
doesn't offer this option, trash your client and get another one.

Similarly, spamware often puts identifiers in the message body so 
that the spammers can track people who reply (possibly to the 
"remove" address) or complain.

--Ron
-- 
Ron Risley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.risley.net
_______________________________________________
spamcon-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers
Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body
    of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to