On 03/23/02, Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The character and structure of abuse desk operations today has no
> business being anything like it was a single year ago. "In the old
> days", 'abuse' was different than it is today; and than it will be
> tomorrow; both in quanity and quality, but most certainly in quantity
> if ISPs don't take a serious responsibility for enforcing AUP.
>
> Once the quantity of complaints crosses a threshold level, a
> responsible ISP should be willing and able to take action which does
> not require exposing the identities of the victims.
Before I start in on an extensive response, which abuse desks
have you worked for? The reason I ask is that the (largely
unwritten) Best Current Practice varies depending on what
kinds of services they provide. For example, Hotmail's abuse
load is extremely different from UUnet's, and subsequently so
are their policies.
--
J.D. Falk <incekt> once I typed "sendmail -jd"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and my hair turned blue.
_______________________________________________
spamcon-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers
Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body
of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
