On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:16:25 -0800, J.D. Falk wrote:
> From an ISP abuse desk perspective, you should always send
> the message exactly as you received it.
Hi J.D,
I'm sure that several of us on this list would like to [continue to]
report abuse in a useful and productive fashion which would include
cooperation with white-hat service provider abuse desks.
Accordingly, at least one of us would like to hear about how the
obfuscation of personal recipient email address and MX details makes a
challenge for an abuser's abuse desk. I'd really like to be cooperative
in this matter, but my reasoning is yet unable to understand how these
obfuscations interfere with anyone identifying the *_source_* of the
abuse; and I do maintain that the identity of the target victim is
irrelevant to whether or not an AUP violation has occurred.
Thanks for your consideration.
I gave up trying to find a useful example to include here.
`~Maynard
_______________________________________________
spamcon-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers
Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body
of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
