On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:09:31 -0400, "Agatha Dydecka"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Hello,
> 
>We have just subscribed to this list as our brand new server was
>attacked and made into a spam machine for several hours. 

Sorry for what drove you here, but welcome to the list!

[...]

>Is there any standard, code of conduct, or law that could help us in
>terminating the offender's account with the providers?

I'm not a lawyer. But...

It's a relatively straightforward exercise to project liability for
damages onto the party that is directly causing the damages. "You used
my machine without my permission, you pay for my damages." Note that
projecting liability is NOT the same as actually collecting civil or
criminal monetary damages.

It's a bit more difficult, but still quite possible, to project
liability to the party that placed the act that caused the damage into
motion - in most cases, either the party being advertised in the spam,
or the beneficiary of the spam's content (be it commercial or other).
"Party A used my machine without my permission on your behalf and acting
as your agent, therefore you are vicariously liable for Party A's
actions."

It's probably quite difficult to project liability for damages onto a
party that provides connectivity services to either the party directly
causing the damages, or the party that is the beneficiary. "You sold
Party A a service, and while they were using that service, they used my
machine without my permission, therefore you are liable for my damages
caused by Party A." That having been said, most responsible ISPs will
terminate the service of both spammers and spam beneficiaries. However,
once you mention foreign service providers, all bets are off. It's not
necessarily that the foreign ISPs are irresponsible (although very many
of them are), but things just work differently.

Generally, however, many people find that the first step, after
identifying both spammer and beneficiary, is to sternly notify the
upstream provider of the beneficiary. That may help, as many networks
prefer to avoid being placed on blocklists due to non-responsiveness.

Ted
_______________________________________________
spamcon-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers
Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body
    of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to