I do think that pursing white lists is not a viable solution for
many of the reasons posted here. Shifting the cost, and what's
worse, the technical hassle to the user is not a good idea. Email
is already too complicated for lots of folks. I can't imagine
having to go through a more complicated scheme.

Dale wrote:
> Second, I'm not talking about giving government more control 
> over my life ...
> However, I would like to use some of the government's power to
> assert control over my mailbox. As I pointed out earlier, there
> is a model for such law with the anti-junk fax laws. On the whole,
> it seems to work pretty well.

Another example that comes to mind are the state laws that regulate
telemarketing, e.g., the no-call lists. I pay a yearly fee to be on
the list in my state (Oregon) and it has been quite effective.

I would gladly pay a yearly fee to be on a "no-email" list. Yes, that
would mean I would be assuming the financial burden, but I would not
mind it if the fee was relatively low (approx. US $5 year) and if it
actually worked (that is, violators could be reported to some authority
who could punish them in some meaningful way, fines, etc.). I don't know
if such a scheme is possible because phone calls are quite different
from email in so many ways.

I would prefer a solution that made the spammers bear the financial
burden. I would support the e-postage idea that someone suggested
was thought of as politically incorrect. Why shouldn't I have to pay
for sending email? Seems okay to me. I don�t know the technical details
but the concept does not seem weird to me. I'd like it if it included
some sort of financial support for certain institutions (libraries?
non-profits?) and low-income users but other than that, what's wrong
with the idea? The technical details may be a problem (I have no clue
about that) but the concept itself?? I'm curious about why this idea
is so unacceptable politically.

Marjorie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
spamcon-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers
Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body
    of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to