direct and to the group .....
I think that SpamCop got this one right; that the top Received line
shows a fradulent sender; and that the bottom Received line was forged
by that sender.
Other opinions may differ; I'm a student at this game, not a master.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 03:24:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This posting made from the web-site. Please reply via
> email in addition to the group. Thanks.
> ------------------------------------------------------
> See <http://spamcop.net/sc?id=z18951331z04710d750c41b7106c430fb444d245dbz>
>
> No spam complaint was sent to sympatico.ca where the spam apparently originated. It
>appears that the relay IP at the beginning of the received from line obfuscated
>proper detection of the originating dialup IP from sympatico.ca.
>
> I would appreciate an acknowledgement that you agree SpamCop software did in fact
>err.
>
> Thank you.
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
