"Maynard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
4qh6440XfSNe-pn2-oU4SjMF9dbpN@captain">news:4qh6440XfSNe-pn2-oU4SjMF9dbpN@captain...
> Why would a user/reporter make a statement about "no action
> requested"?
i agree it could be clearer, but it's not saying that... it's saying that
spamcop hasn't determined that any action is needed, and that no action
needs to be taken in relation to marking things in spamcop's database...
> The page link accessable to the recipient doesn't have any opportunity
> to mark the issue as solved or innocent or whatever.
as i've said before, what issue? if you're reporting one of the issues
(source, a web page or whatever) that spamcop has identified, it has no way
of knowing which of them, and if you're sending a report about a reply-to or
something else that spamcop hasn't picked up, then the issue isn't even in
spamcop's records...
> "We removed the server from our network since it violated our
> AUP/TOS."
that's a note that's been added by a recipient... probably shouldn't be
popping up there though...
> AND "This issue has already been reported as an innocent bystander. "
that always appears there, and that's also a screw up...
> and to add to the confusion certain to be experienced by the
> recipient, they get the irritating flashing red banner ad, which can
> cause the viewer to jump up and go kick the family dog for lying in
> the sun.
you speak from experience? :)
> As a member user, there is no way I would consciously submit such a
> worthless report as currently provided by the User Notification
> option; and I currently fear that the only probable result of anybody
> submitting this option would be to seriously degrade SC's viability as
> a serious and useful operation.
i think you're overreacting, but the page that comes up when the link is
clicked could certainly have better wording, and those spurious bits
removed...
michael
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
