Don,
Why would a user/reporter make a statement about "no action
requested"?
The page link accessable to the recipient doesn't have any opportunity
to mark the issue as solved or innocent or whatever.
The page link accessable to the recipient makes apparently goofy
statements about (in my test):
"We removed the server from our network since it violated our
AUP/TOS."
AND "This issue has already been reported as an innocent bystander. "
and to add to the confusion certain to be experienced by the
recipient, they get the irritating flashing red banner ad, which can
cause the viewer to jump up and go kick the family dog for lying in
the sun.
As a member user, there is no way I would consciously submit such a
worthless report as currently provided by the User Notification
option; and I currently fear that the only probable result of anybody
submitting this option would be to seriously degrade SC's viability as
a serious and useful operation.
The feature is not just useless. It is counter-productive; and needs
serious and immediate consideration by the SC team.
I reported on my tests of all three user entry opportunities, to the
SpamCop group on 9 April, with Subject beginning with "?Broken?" and
are still available there for anybody who doesn't want to run the
tests themselves, with recommendations for how this user would enhance
their operation.
Try to imagine yourself in the role of the recipient.
Best,
`~Maynard
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 19:59:31, Argyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Peter Guy wrote:
> > "no action is requested" ???
>
> Exactly. SpamCop didn't pick the recipient for that report, the user
> did.
>
> It's a defensive statement from SpamCop in hopes that the recipient
> will understand it's not SpamCop's doing that got him that report.
> --
>
> - Don D'Minion -
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
