I just got an email about this issue from my contact at Google:

> I received an update about the bug earlier today.  It looks like our
> engineering team has created a patch for the issue.  It should be
> pushed with the next calendar release.  I'll need to follow up to find
> out when the next release is.

So that's good news. As soon as I learn when that release will be,
I'll let everyone know.

In the mean time, if you've been affected by this problem please
contact [email protected] so we can extend your Spanning Sync
subscription end date accordingly.

Thanks,
Charlie



On Jan 11, 9:46 pm, Kazia Shuff <[email protected]> wrote:
> I tried limiting it to the past 60 and it still failed. then 30 and it still 
> failled... then 20 and still failed. So no such luck changing to only recent 
> events in the application itself. Maybe if the feed is changed in the program 
> code this will work, but nothing the end user can change.
>
> Kazia
>
> On Jan 11, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Jon wrote:
>
>
>
> > I concur that this problem is particularly frustrating, and while I
> > know it's in Google's hands, I have done a bit of digging and have
> > found some ways the Spanning Sync team might be able to work around it
> > (hopefully this can be passed on to the engineering team).  Spanning
> > Sync is trying to download events from the Google servers using the
> > feed.  The Google servers choke on requests to the feed that Spanning
> > Sync makes that look like the following (I've removed some of the
> > details for my privacy):
>
> > http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/[email protected]/private/full?gsessionid=REDACTED&updated-min=197
> >  0-03-17T00:00:00-00:00&max-results=100000
>
> > I've noticed that if you change the min from 1970 to 2009, it works
> > fine (farther back, not so much). So, I would imagine that there may
> > be a workaround that involves only polling recent events.  Has anyone
> > tried limiting the sync to the past 30 days (I believe Spanning Sync
> > has such an option)?  Spanning Sync team, does this information help
> > you?  This problem really needs a solution, even if it's only a
> > temporary measure, as this has been happening for nearly a month now.
>
> > Jon
>
> > On Jan 11, 12:31 pm, jc <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I just wanted to let you know that I tried to "start over." Spanning
> >> Sync continues to be in stuck in an"nfinite loop of sync.  But at
> >> least it's not giving error messages anymore I suppose.
>
> >> On Jan 11, 7:34 am, cwood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> Several of our customers are still experiencing this problem, and we
> >>> know how frustrating it is. We're hounding Google for a resolution,
> >>> and will report back as soon as we know more.
>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Charlie
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Spanning Sync" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Spanning Sync" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en.


Reply via email to