Works like a charm!! love it when they are easy fixes!!
Much appreciate all the help!
Rebekah


On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Luis Mendoza <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Sent it to you offline.  Let us know if you have any trouble with it.
> --Luis
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Rebekah Dawson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Ok - convenient option and sounds easy. Didn't think about that. Could
> you
> > send me copy? I don't have another machine with TPP...
> >
> > Thanks!!
> > R
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Luis Mendoza
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Rebekah,
> >> Since this is strictly a viewer issue, you may also just install the
> >> old viewer so you can take advantage of the motif coloring and stats
> >> while we come up with a fix.  You can either copy the protxml2html.pl
> >> file from another machine that has the TPP (pre-4.5.1) installed into
> >> the tpp-bin directory, or we can give you one.
> >> Cheers,
> >> --Luis
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Rebekah Dawson <
> [email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I see the modification N[115], but not the color coding and also the
> >> > calculation at the bottom of the page for # NxS/T peptides vs total #
> >> > peptides is empty. I find this to be very useful when calculating
> >> > specificity of our capturing method. If i know it is a bug, then I'll
> >> > wait
> >> > for a fix. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't supposed to be clicking
> any
> >> > more buttons to get it to show up.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> > Rebekah
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, [email protected]
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hello Ruby,
> >> >>
> >> >> I believe this problem is only with the ProteinProphet viewer not the
> >> >> modelling.  Someone else had reported this problem also but it has
> not
> >> >> been
> >> >> fixed in this release.  The problem is in the coloring off the motif
> >> >> only.
> >> >>  You should still see the motif in the peptides you identify.
> >> >>
> >> >> -David
> >> >>
> >> >> Sent from my Android Device
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Reply message -----
> >> >> From: "Ruby" <[email protected]>
> >> >> To: "spctools-discuss" <[email protected]>
> >> >> Subject: [spctools-discuss] GLYC not working in 4.5.2?
> >> >> Date: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 6:51 am
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I have been using the GLYC command in TPP 4.4.0 for more than a year
> >> >> with no problem. I recently upgraded to TPP 4.5.2 and can't seem to
> >> >> get the GLYC command to work for ProteinProphet. I have the "N-
> >> >> glycosylation data (color NXS/T)" option checked in petunia when
> doing
> >> >> ProteinProphet processing, and in the ProteinProphet header the "NxS/
> >> >> T" box is checked. However, I do NOT see any pink highlighted N[115]
> >> >> in the peptides like I used to see nor does it calculate the # of
> >> >> glycopeptides at the bottom of the page - though most of my peptides
> >> >> do contain this modification. I am selecting the option to use the
> >> >> "Use N-glyc motif information" when I do the peptideprophet.
> >> >>
> >> >> Is there something else I"m supposed to be doing to get this to work
> >> >> in the new update of TPP?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> Ruby
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> >> Groups
> >> >> "spctools-discuss" group.
> >> >> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >> [email protected].
> >> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> >> Groups
> >> >> "spctools-discuss" group.
> >> >> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >> [email protected].
> >> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups
> >> > "spctools-discuss" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > [email protected].
> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "spctools-discuss" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "spctools-discuss" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to