I am using Linux. Do i need to compile it again?

Regards

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:07 PM, David Shteynberg <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Vidya,
>
> I have added the support of Morpheus into the TPP codebase.  Please let me
> know which OS (windows or linux) you are processing on so I can provide you
> with an executable that you should be able to use.
>
> Thanks,
> -David
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Vidya Venkatraman <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I just shared a box folder with you which contains mzML, fasta and the
>> pepxml file.
>>
>> https://cedars.app.box.com/folder/50657299852
>>
>> Regards
>> Vidya
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 9:41 AM, David Shteynberg <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Vidya,
>>>
>>> Currently, there is no support for Morpheus in the TPP.  If you are able
>>> to place you search results in a shared drive and send me a link for
>>> testing, I should be able to add the Morpheus support back in.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Davod
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Vidya Venkatraman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>> I am using TPP v5.1.0 and when i try to run xinteract on the Morpheus
>>>> pep.xml, I get the following error that engine Morpheus not recognized. Any
>>>> ideas if I am missing something?
>>>>
>>>> xinteract (TPP v5.1.0 Syzygy, Build 201806211802-exported
>>>> (Linux-x86_64))
>>>>
>>>> running: "/hpc/apps/TPP/5.1.0/bin/InteractParser
>>>> 'interact.morpheus.pep.xml' '2017-12-4_ABRF_200_DDA1.pep.xml' -L'7'"
>>>>  file 1: 2017-12-4_ABRF_200_DDA1.pep.xml
>>>>  processed altogether 72135 results
>>>> command completed in 9 sec
>>>>
>>>> running: "/hpc/apps/TPP/5.1.0/bin/DatabaseParser
>>>> 'interact.morpheus.pep.xml'"
>>>> command completed in 1 sec
>>>>
>>>> running: "/hpc/apps/TPP/5.1.0/bin/RefreshParser
>>>> 'interact.morpheus.pep.xml' '/common/venkatramanv/Data/Pra
>>>> tik/Thermo/DDA/raw/PRG2016_DECOY.fasta'"
>>>>
>>>>   - Searching the tree...
>>>>   - Linking duplicate entries...
>>>>   - Printing results...
>>>>
>>>> command completed in 15 sec
>>>>
>>>> running: "/hpc/apps/TPP/5.1.0/bin/PeptideProphetParser
>>>> 'interact.morpheus.pep.xml' ACCMASS RT NONPARAM DECOYPROBS DECOY=DECOY_"
>>>> using Accurate Mass Bins
>>>> using RT
>>>> Using Decoy Label "DECOY_".
>>>> Decoy Probabilities will be reported.
>>>> Using non-parametric distributions
>>>>  (Morpheus)
>>>> error: engine Morpheus not recognized
>>>>
>>>> command "/hpc/apps/TPP/5.1.0/bin/PeptideProphetParser
>>>> 'interact.morpheus.pep.xml' ACCMASS RT NONPARAM DECOYPROBS DECOY=DECOY_"
>>>> exited with non-zero exit code: 256
>>>> QUIT - the job is incomplete
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Vidya
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, February 7, 2014 at 12:22:54 PM UTC-8, David Shteynberg
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I was able to make a first stab attempt at it and I was successful
>>>>> after minor modification to the way spectrum_names are encoded in
>>>>> spectrum_query tags in the morpheus pepXML files.  After running a simple
>>>>> sed to replace the names with something that wouldn't overlap with anoth
>>>>> file when combined by using the each run's basename I was able to generate
>>>>> results.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My PeptideProphet processed analysis for these two searches can be
>>>>> downloaded here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/f5r8j5yj2p2r3b8/morpheus_interact.tgz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are my sed commands, but I hope this could be fixed within
>>>>> morpheus.
>>>>>
>>>>>  sed -i 's/controllerType=0 controllerNumber=1
>>>>> scan=[0-9]*/OR20080317_S_SILAC-LH_1-1_01/g'
>>>>> OR20080317_S_SILAC-LH_1-1_01.pep.xml
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  sed -i 's/controllerType=0 controllerNumber=1
>>>>> scan=[0-9]*/OR20080320_S_SILAC-LH_1-1_11/g'
>>>>> OR20080320_S_SILAC-LH_1-1_11.pep.xml
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.  I expect to merge this into the SVN codebase sooner than later.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Dave Trudgian <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> David,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the same data. I've made PepXML and the other Morpheus output
>>>>>> available at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://proteomics.swmed.edu/data/morpheus_tpp/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, February 6, 2014 5:36:35 PM UTC-6, David Shteynberg
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was referring to this data:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://tools.proteomecenter.org/wiki/index.php?title=TPP_Tutorial_v2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, this is not high res MS/MS either.  This would be a good
>>>>>>> starting point.  The decoys and targets don't have to separate by score
>>>>>>> alone, PeptideProphet should be able to model the plots you show in 
>>>>>>> either
>>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Dave Trudgian <david.t...@
>>>>>>> utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am happy to generate some pepXMLs from the tutorial data, but
>>>>>>>> assuming you mean the stuff at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ftp://ftp.peptideatlas.org/pub/PeptideAtlas/Repository/TPP_D
>>>>>>>> emo2009/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... I'm not sure that's the best to work with for Morpheus. It's
>>>>>>>> CID Ion-trap MS/MS, which is not Morpheus' target. Morpheus doesn't 
>>>>>>>> work as
>>>>>>>> well as other algorithms on low-res MS/MS so I'm not sure if anyone 
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> want to use it like that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I grabbed two of the result sets from the Coon lab site - Yeast
>>>>>>>> analysis with FT HCD or IT CID. The distributions of Morpheus scores 
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> very different. The CID data doesn't even look like target and decoy
>>>>>>>> matches are separable, so I think high-res MS/MS is a must. See 
>>>>>>>> attached.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DT
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:44:08 PM UTC-6, David Shteynberg
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was dabbling in this, but running into some issues with morpheus
>>>>>>>>> slowing my machine to a point where I was unable to do any other work 
>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>> moved to another project.  However, I am certainly still interested in
>>>>>>>>> this, but I know that pepXML coming out of morpheus may need some 
>>>>>>>>> work.  If
>>>>>>>>> you'd be willing to generate some pepXML's from the tutorial data and 
>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>> with me to correct the pepXML issues I should be able to model the 
>>>>>>>>> results
>>>>>>>>> quite quickly with PeptideProphet.  Please let me know if that sounds 
>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>> to you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Eric Deutsch <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave, at ISB we are not planning this, so please go ahead and
>>>>>>>>>> let us know how it goes!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:spctools...@
>>>>>>>>>> googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Dave Trudgian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 06, 2014 12:02 PM
>>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* [spctools-discuss] Re: support for Morpheus search
>>>>>>>>>> algorithm in TPP
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Craig, just wondering if you or anyone else is working on this?
>>>>>>>>>> If not I was thinking I would have a go at putting in a Morpheus 
>>>>>>>>>> model for
>>>>>>>>>> PeptideProphet towards the end of next week.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dave Trudgian
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, November 30, 2013 4:37:30 PM UTC-6, Craig Wenger
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there a mechanism for adding support for a new search
>>>>>>>>>> algorithm to the various TPP tools? A few users have requested TPP
>>>>>>>>>> compatibility for the Morpheus
>>>>>>>>>> <http://morpheus-ms.sourceforge.net/> search algorithm. It
>>>>>>>>>> already outputs pepXML.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Craig
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group
>>>>>>>>>> /spctools-discuss.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group
>>>>>>>>>> /spctools-discuss.
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/to
>>> pic/spctools-discuss/qdmov2KGlJE/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "spctools-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to